HIGHLIGHTING PATIENT OUTCOMES
SOTYKTU RESULTS FOR PAIN, FATIGUE, AND PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING AT WEEKS 16 AND 52
POETYK PSA-2, EXPLORATORY ENDPOINTS:
GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF PAIN (COMPONENT OF ACR, AS OBSERVED)1*
Global Assessment of Pain was a component of the ACR composite score and was an exploratory endpoint at Week 16 and Week 52. Outcomes were analyzed descriptively; therefore, statistical significance has not been established. As-observed analysis: patients with missing data at a specific time are not included, which may enrich the population and increase response rates.3,4
In PSA-1 (exploratory endpoint)2*:
Change in Global Assessment of Pain from baseline at Week 16 was -23.5 for SOTYKTU (n=336) vs -12.6 for placebo (n=334); at Week 52: -30.5 for SOTYKTU (n=336).
| There was no placebo comparator after Week 16 because patients were switched to SOTYKTU.3,4 |
| * | As a patient-reported outcome, Global Assessment of Pain results reflect subjective perception and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and objective assessments. |
FACIT-Fatigue outcomes were analyzed descriptively; therefore, statistical significance has not been established.3,4
| * | The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item patient questionnaire assessing fatigue and its impact on function. Scores range from 0-52 with higher scores indicating less fatigue.5 As a patient-reported outcome, FACIT-Fatigue results reflect subjective perception and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and objective assessments. |
| † | Missing data were addressed using a control-based statistical method (multiple imputation). This approach estimates outcomes based on patterns observed in the control group.5 |
| FACIT-Fatigue=Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue; MI=multiple imputation; QD=once daily. |
POETYK PSA-2:
IMPROVEMENT IN PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING, HAQ-DI (MI)4*†
Exploratory endpoints were analyzed descriptively; therefore, statistical significance has not been established.3,4
In PSA-13:
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 (secondary endpoint) was -0.4 for SOTYKTU (n=336) vs -0.2 for placebo (n=334); P<0.0001. At Week 52 (exploratory endpoint), change from baseline in HAQ-DI was -0.5 for SOTYKTU (n=336).
| There was no placebo comparator after Week 16 because patients were switched to SOTYKTU.3,4 |
| * | The HAQ-DI encompasses 8 key domains of daily activities, including dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants answer 20 questions about their ability to perform these activities of daily living, with each item rated from 0 to 3, with “3” indicating inability to complete the task. As a patient-reported outcome, HAQ-DI results reflect subjective perception and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and objective assessments.6 |
| † | Missing data were addressed using a control-based statistical method (multiple imputation). This approach estimates outcomes based on patterns observed in the control group.3 |
| ‡ | P=0.0013.4 |
| HAQ-DI=Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index; MI=multiple imputation; QD=once daily. |
SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was a secondary endpoint at Week 16 (change from baseline): PSA-1: 6.1 for SOTYKTU vs 3.7 for placebo. PSA-2: 5.8 for SOTYKTU vs 3.8 for placebo. As a patient‑reported outcome, SF‑36 PCS results reflect subjective perception and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings and objective assessments.3,4
ACR=American College of Rheumatology; FACIT-Fatigue=Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI=Health Assessment Questionaire-Disability Index; PsA=psoriatic arthritis; QD=once daily; SF-36=36-item Short Form Survey.
ARE YOU READY TO EXPLORE MORE? SELECT A TOPIC BELOW.
- Data on File. REF-02230-1787. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026.
- Data on File. REF-02232-1787. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026.
- van der Heijde D, Mease PJ, Paul C, et al. Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib up to week 52: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Paper presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Convergence 2025; October 24-29, 2025; Chicago, IL.
- Mease PJ, Chandran V, Armstrong AW, et al. Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib up to week 52 from POETYK PsA-2: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Paper presented at the EULAR 2025 European Congress of Rheumatology; June 11-14, 2025; Barcelona, Spain.
- Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, et al. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):936–939.
- Fairley JL, Hansen D, Proudman S, et al. Clinical associations of worsening physical function as measured by HAQ-DI scores in systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2025;10(3):545-555.